Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Why I Won't Be Doing Prenatal Screening

Image Source
In Ontario (and most of the developed world), pregnant women are offered something called Prenatal Screening. The screening usually involves both blood work and ultrasound, and is done at around 11 weeks.

In my first pregnancy, prenatal screening wasn't really offered as a choice to me. I began my pregnancy under the care of my family doctor, as I was still on the waiting list to get a midwife. Midwives practice something called informed choice - you are given all the relevant information about specific tests/procedures, and then it's up to you to make the final decision.

Most doctors, however, do not practice informed choice, and instead tend to offer up tests/procedures as the "normal" thing to do. There's a whole body of evidence out there which shows that most clinicians are not successful at involving their patients in making health care decisions.

So when prenatal screening comes up in pregnancy, it's not so much a choice, as it is "the thing to do." And so I did!

If women understand the consequences of the screening, and have a good grasp on what they would do with the information, then there is no problem. But when women are unsure, or consent to procedures without really understanding what's going to happen, then it is a problem.

Screening tests for three things - Down Syndrome, Trisomy 18 and Open Neural Tube Defects. You will be told your chance of having a baby with these conditions (e.g. 1 in 250), and if your chance is higher than expected, you have a positive result. This does not necessarily mean your baby has one of these conditions, but it does mean you're offered further diagnostic testing (usually in the form of amniocentesis, which carries its own risks). If an accurate diagnosis is made through amnio, then you have three options:

1) Prepare yourself for life with a child who has disabilities, or a child who will die shortly after birth (depending on the severity of the condition)

2) Plan to give your child up for adoption if you feel you cannot handle caring for a child with disabilities

3) Abort your pregnancy

Clearly, none of these options are what any parent wants to go through. We all want to have a healthy child. But once you choose to undergo prenatal screening, you must be able to think ahead and imagine what you might do with the information you are given. If you get a positive result, will you go for amniocentesis (despite its small risk of miscarriage)? If you get a diagnosis, which option will you choose?

Testing for these conditions also raises a number of ethical issues, and potentially better screening tools soon to come on the market may have parents choosing to abort before they've had a glimpse of their baby via ultrasound or through movements felt - before any kind of bonding has occurred. Some experts suggest that the abortion rate for parents who discover their baby has Down Syndrome could be as high as 90%. Parents of children with Down Syndrome are concerned over this fact, as clearly, children with Down Syndrome are just as loved/special/amazing as children without the extra chromosome. As genetic testing becomes more advanced and available, you have to wonder where this will take us? How far is too far?

The 90% abortion rate definitely scares me. As a second time parent, I have firsthand experience loving a child. I bonded with my baby immediately upon discovering I was pregnant this time around. But as a first-time mom, I remember the baby in my belly being kind of abstract. Bonding didn't happen until later (and probably even later than it happens between most other mothers and babies). If the test had discovered one of the three conditions, would I have considered abortion and gone on to have major regrets? Part of me thinks "no," that I would have just prepared myself for life with a child with disabilities, but I wonder if other mothers out there have regretted the hasty decision.

So this time around, we have opted not to do prenatal screening. If I received the diagnosis during pregnancy, I don't think the information would be good for my well being. I'm a worrier, and my anxiety would probably rise to unmanageable levels. Plus, I'm a kinesthetic learner - I learn by doing and experiencing, not by reading books or observing other people's experiences. So life with a child with disabilities would be a shock, but I would need to learn as I went along.

Plus, as my midwife put it, "if you're a woman who believes in letting nature take its course, then prenatal screening is probably not the right choice for you." And that's exactly who I am - I believe that all things happen for a reason, and I would be willing to go down a difficult path if I needed to. Even one where I might have to say goodbye to my baby shortly after birth.

What is your experience with prenatal screening?

11 comments:

  1. I didn't do screening for either pregnancy. It was offered, I got the pamphlet and flat out asked 'why would I want to do it?'. There was no solid answer that could convince me. So I opted out. At the time, opting out was apparently the strange thing to do (6 years ago) because like you said, it was implied that it was just done.

    I have/had no regrets. Aren't things so much clearer the second time? ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Rebecca, things feel a lot clearer this time around :) The first pregnancy is definitely a big lesson!

      Delete
  2. I didn't do screening for either pregnancy either. All of my friends have got it and think I'm weird for not wanting to know if my baby will have a disability. I just always knew that I would deal with whatever I was faced with and the test wouldn't change things. I also believe that it goes along with my general way of life to let nature take it's course.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Alicia - it's good to know I'm not alone in my choices!

      Delete
  3. We are currently talking about this! We turned it down with our daughter but have been really pushed to do it this time with the twins. I'm not at all wanting to, but I wonder if it's better or needed with a multiple pregnancy? I haven't had a chance to ask the Dr since thinking it over more, but since we wouldn't do an amnio or abort (or anything) I can't see the point. Any ideas if there is a reason to do it with more than one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Diana! That's a really good question - I'd have to do some research on the topic. It could be true that certain birth defects/conditions are more common in twins.

      But it sounds like if you wouldn't do amnio or abort, then there would be no reason to do the testing. Even if you get a positive result, it's likely you'd end up giving birth to 2 healthy babies

      Delete
  4. I declined the screening with all four of my children. I personally wouldn't abort so I didn't see the point in causing myself any unnecessary stress over a potential 'positive' screen result. I personally would rather enjoy my pregnancy and have to deal with the unlikely chance of having a disabled child than go through the invasiveness of screening, amnio, etc. for information that may or may not be accurate.

    Also at the time I had my second son my midwife pointed out that with the wait times for an amnio where we lived, plus the waiting for the report to go back to your practitioner, etc. that it was unlikely we'd have all the information before the abortion cut off at most clinics anyways. So even if that is something the patient would consider, it's not even always a viable option.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a really good point Maranda - had no idea the wait times were so long. I'll bring this up with clients who are worrying about whether or not to do the screening

      Delete
  5. I declined the screening with my last child, having experienced all of the stress the first couple of times round. The doctor wasn't pleased (high-risk pregnancy, no midwives with privileges at our hospital and home birth not an option), however, I pointed out that the results of the test wouldn't change anything for me. I would refuse amnio, I was having an ultrasound anyway, and in the end I wanted my baby. The lack of stress and worry during that pregnancy was wonderful!

    I think the key is "informed choice". Sometimes MDs don't appreciate it when you're informed. Just my personal observation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, there are many amazing MDs out there who DO listen well and involve their patients. However, in my work as a researcher, I know that the majority of healthcare practitioners do not practice shared decision making (even when they think they do!!)

      Delete
  6. The other problem with these tests is the high rate of false positives. I had the NT screening, which raised my risk to 1 in 50. After the first blood test, my risk was raised to 10%. After the final blood test, my risk was lowered to 0.4%!! As a first time mom, I was starting to get very worried after the risk jumped from 2% to 10%, when I didn't need to worry at all. Why give results out if there can be such a huge swing in the final outcome?

    Stephanie

    ReplyDelete

I love comments and emails, as most bloggers do! You can reach me by clicking on my "about me" page and sending me an email, or leave me a note below a post and I'll be sure to get back to you!